Contrast this with the condition stimulus. It only prompts a response after a person or animal has learned to associate the stimulus with a certain response.
Examples of Unconditioned Stimuli
Unconditioned stimuli are all around us. Think about:
The smell of a favorite food, which immediately makes you feel hungryA feather tickling your nose, which causes you to sneezeAn onion’s smell as you cut it, which makes your eyes waterPollen from grass and flowers, which causes you to sneezeA unexpected loud bang, which causes you to flinch
In each of these examples, the unconditioned stimulus naturally triggers an unconditioned response or reflex. You don’t have to learn to respond to the unconditioned stimulus; it occurs automatically.
The Unconditioned Stimulus in Pavlov’s Experiment
In Ivan Pavlov’s classic experiment with dogs, Pavlov and his assistants showed the dogs edible and non-edible items and measured saliva production with each. Salivation occurred automatically and without the dogs’ conscious effort when they smelled the food. This response required no learning. The food was an unconditioned stimulus because it prompted a reflexive response.
The Little Albert Experiment
Building on Pavlov’s work, behaviorist John B. Watson and graduate student Rosalie Rayner conducted what came to be known as “the Little Albert experiment.” The research showed that emotional reactions could be classically conditioned in people. Watson and Rayner exposed a 9-month-old child, Albert, to a white rat, a rabbit, a monkey, masks, and burning newspapers and observed the boy’s reactions. He showed no fear of them at first. But after Watson began making a loud noise—an unconditioned stimulus that provoked Albert’s crying—whenever he showed Albert the white rat, Albert became frightened whenever he saw the white rat. Because he’d learned to associate the white rat with a noise he feared, he ultimately reacted with fear to the rat as well. The rat, once a neutral stimulus, had become a conditioned stimulus.
The Neutral Stimulus
For the purposes of classical conditioning or learning, you need a neutral stimulus as well as an unconditioned stimulus. In other words, for conditioning to take place, you must first start by pairing a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus. When it is initially presented, the neutral stimulus has no effect on behavior. As it is repeatedly paired with an unconditioned stimulus, it will begin to cause the same response as the UCS. For example, the assistants in Pavlov’s experiment initially elicited no salivation and therefore were neutral stimuli. Likewise, the sound of a squeaky door opening is initially a neutral stimulus. If that sound is repeatedly paired with an unconditioned stimulus, such as feeding your cat, that sound will eventually come to trigger a change in your cat’s behavior. Once an association has been formed, your cat may react as if it is being fed every time it hears the squeaky door open.
Unconditioned Stimulus vs. Conditioned Stimulus
An unconditioned stimulus causes a response without any prior learning on the part of the subject. The response is automatic and occurs without thought. In contrast, a conditioned stimulus produces a reaction only after the subject has learned to associate it with a given outcome. In Pavlov’s experiments, the dogs learned to salivate when they saw the assistants’ white lab coats because they’d formed an association between the assistants and the food they presented, The salivary response to the assistants was not an automatic, physiological process, but a learned one. The presence of the assistants, initially a neutral stimulus, became a conditioned stimulus.
Timing of Learned Behavior
Throughout the classical conditioning process, a number of factors can influence how quickly associations are learned. The length of time that passes between presenting the initially neutral stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus is one of the most important factors in whether learning occurs.
Types of Classical Conditioning
In Pavlov’s experiment, the sound of a buzzer was initially a neutral stimulus, while the smell of food was an unconditioned stimulus. Presenting the tone close to presenting the smell of food resulted in a stronger association. Ringing the buzzer, the neutral stimulus, long before the unconditioned stimulus led to a much weaker or even nonexistent association. Different types of conditioning may use different timing or order between the neutral stimulus and the UCS.
