Some examples of social constructs are countries and money. It is easier to see how countries could be social constructs than it is to see how money is a social construct. Countries would not exist were it not for human interaction. Humans have to agree that there is such a thing as a country and agree on what a country is. Without that agreement, there could be no countries. Money also would not exist without human interaction. If we think about objective reality, we might think that the money does exist. After all, we can touch the paper or the coins. However, unless humans agree on what the paper or the coins represent and can be used for, the paper money is just paper and the coins are just metal disks.
Why Humans Create Social Constructs
Social construct theory says that humans create constructs in order to make sense of the objective world. Or they see tall plants with very thick stalks that branch out at the top and have leaves growing on them and “create” the construct of a tree. Those two examples help illustrate how humans use social constructs and how different some social constructs are from other social constructs. Do trees exist outside of the social construct? If we didn’t agree on the construct of a tree, would we see those plants any differently? What about race? Does race exist outside of the social construct? Would we treat people of different colors differently if we did not have the social construct of race?
Social Constructs Can Change
A social construct can include values and beliefs that humans have about the construct. Humans can alter the construct as they continue to interact with the world.
Gender As a Social Construct
A little more than 50 years ago, people believed that men and women had specific gender-related roles determined by biology: Women are more nurturing so they were best suited to be mothers who stayed at home to raise children. Men are more aggressive and less nurturing, best suited to go out to work and provide for the family. We don’t believe that anymore about men and women. The social construct of gender illustrates the nature/nurture debate about human behavior. If gender is only a social construct, it means that men and women act differently only because society has dictated their roles to them. They have learned how they should behave and what they should sound or look like. The “nature vs nurture” debate remains contentious when it comes to sex and gender differences. But most researchers believe that, whatever role inherent biological factors play, environmental factors are a major influence that can affect the development of the brain itself.
History of Social Constructionism
The first work to cover social constructionism was “Mind, Self, and Society” by American sociologist George Herbert Mead (1934). He argued that as social beings, we construct our own realities through our interactions with each other. Building on this, sociologists Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann coined the term “social construction” in their 1966 book “The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.” Their work brought the idea of social constructionism to the forefront of mainstream sociology. Since that time, social constructionism has become a widely accepted and studied theory, although it has taken on varying shades of meaning. In 2012, preeminent psychologist Dave Elder-Vass published “The Reality of Social Construction,” which posited that social constructionism is compatible with—not opposed to—realist social theory, and that both viewpoints have a place in sociology.
